Should you bid what you think your side can make? by Frank Stewart

A: 3NT: In theory, partner shows six spades and four diamonds, but he may have a minimum 5-5 hand or may have meant three diamonds as a "fourth suit" bid, showing distress. Bid 3NT, which will be best opposite A K 8 6 4 3, 2, 10 5 3, A Q 2. A three-heart rebid would also be reasonable.

Your result so far:

A: 4♠: If your side isn't vulnerable and has less to gain by making a game, you might settle for a bid of three clubs as a try for game. If instead you're vulnerable, I'd recommend a different game try: Bid game and try to make it. I'd bid four spades and let the defense try to beat it.

Your result so far:

A: 4♥: After your 2NT response, partner's bid in a new suit shows a singleton there. You can judge how well your hands fit together. Since your K-Q of diamonds are wasted, make no aggressive move. Bid four hearts to sign off.

Your result so far:

A: 1♠: You must not pass for penalty. Your diamond holding is ragged, and your values aren't sufficient to try to beat a one-level contract. Go after your own contract: Bid one spade. If your queen of spades were the ace, you would have enough to jump to two spades, inviting game.


Your result so far:

A: 3♥: Partner has a strong hand. With A Q 4 3, Q 5 4, 7 5, A J 5 2, he would pass 1NT; he couldn't know that a contract of two hearts would be better. Your decent five-card suit and side king require a try for game. Bid three hearts. Partner may hold A K 4 3, Q J 4, 5, A J 5 3 2.

Your result so far: