It all gets more complex by Bobby Wolff

A: Double: Facing a passed hand, are you supposed to double a weak two-diamond bid? If West were not a passed hand, I might leave well enough alone and wait for partner to reopen; in fact, in my heart of hearts, I think it is probably right to pass anyway. Certainly, if my diamonds and spades were switched, I would go low. Still, I can't stand to see my opponents push me around, so I'll double.


Your result so far:

A: Redouble: When the opponents pass you out in a low-level doubled contract, assume they are right unless your own hand informs you to the contrary. Here, the spades are stacked over your partner, but one of the minors may provide a safe haven. Redouble for rescue, and let your partner find a better spot -- if there is one.

Your result so far:

A: 1NT: My rule is not to raise partner's major with three without a ruffing value (so this would be an easy rebid of one no-trump over a response of one heart, for example). Here, I'm not so sure. Unless partner has at least three cards in both clubs and hearts, spades might play better -- especially from his side. I can go either way, but I think I'd go with the field and bid one no-trump, with misgivings.

Your result so far:

A: 1NT: I would recommend going through the forcing no-trump rather than raising hearts (assuming you play raises as constructive). The sterile distribution and weak trumps suggest taking the pessimistic position. I agree that this is close; make the trumps 10-9-third, and I might take the opposite path.

Your result so far:

A: 4♦: There is no need to do anything but raise to four diamonds here. A jump to game would be weaker than the simple raise. You may not have a great hand, but you do have good trumps, a control and a ruffing value. The real question is whether to cooperate in any cue-bidding sequence partner may initiate. I say yes.

Your result so far: